-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add new subclass relation to social behavior. #14099
Comments
This would lead to unsatisfiable classes. If we look at the property chains for http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0000057 we see the 'only' would not work. In general you should be very careful with only restrictions. You never have them for transitive properties, and they are frequently invalid for chains. A some axiom would be valid |
What's the action here ? |
on reflection I think changing the only restriction to some still has problems. I don't think a population is a participant in the process. |
So is the idea here that this is a behavior that an individual participates in, but it is toward one or more members of the same species (using the word toward loosely, not in the RO sense)? Is there a class for a behavior in which a group participates, like a swarm or a migrating flock? Or are group behaviors considered simply aggregates of individual behaviors? |
But certainly out of scope for GO - maybe look to NBO for your class. We still don't have a good solution for NBO-GO integration, so the current situation of lots of equivalent classes will likely persist for a while. |
Thanks Chris. It's clear now. |
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0035176 (social behavior) is defined as "Behavior directed towards society, or taking place between members of the same species. Occurs predominantly, or only, in individuals that are part of a group."
It would be helpful to PCO if GO could add an axiom subClassOf 'has participant' only 'single-species collection of organisms' (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/PCO_0000018). We are defining some subclasses of this, see PopulationAndCommunityOntology/pco#46
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: