We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What should be the acceptable behavior of witi(abstracts_stm) or create_oolong(abstracts_stm, type = "witi")?
witi(abstracts_stm)
create_oolong(abstracts_stm, type = "witi")
For old users, it should give you an oolong object with only wi because input_corpus is NULL. It is also the current behavior.
wi
input_corpus
But it can be quite confusing if one asks for wi and ti but only be given an object with wi.
ti
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
fix a bug of ti when input_corpus is NULL, ref #49
6c0b9ce
No branches or pull requests
What should be the acceptable behavior of
witi(abstracts_stm)
orcreate_oolong(abstracts_stm, type = "witi")
?For old users, it should give you an oolong object with only
wi
becauseinput_corpus
is NULL. It is also the current behavior.But it can be quite confusing if one asks for
wi
andti
but only be given an object withwi
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: