You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we match only on the name in the current language, so if you run the app in English or Dutch it matches on "Nico" and on "NCU", and in Polish it matches on "Miko" and "UMK".
Should we match across languages? Might be confusing when matches show that don't seem to match the query, but also may make it harder to find an organization when looking for the English name or abbreviation while running in the local language.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Prioritizing matches in the preferred language is quite different from the current way: it either matches or not, then sorted alphabetically. We don't sort by how well an entry matches.
When needing to search through all languages, I do think it might be time to bite the bullet on using SQLite locally.
Currently we match only on the name in the current language, so if you run the app in English or Dutch it matches on "Nico" and on "NCU", and in Polish it matches on "Miko" and "UMK".
Should we match across languages? Might be confusing when matches show that don't seem to match the query, but also may make it harder to find an organization when looking for the English name or abbreviation while running in the local language.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: