[copilot-session-insights] Daily Copilot Agent Session Analysis — 2026-01-31 #12884
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-02-07T07:30:09.585Z. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Executive Summary
Key Metrics
📉 Critical Finding: Completion Rate Decline
The completion rate has dropped significantly from 44% (Jan 28) to 2% (today). This represents the lowest completion rate in the last 16 days of analysis.
Historical Completion Rate Trend
What Changed?
The dramatic shift suggests:
action_requiredstatus, indicating orchestration workflows that delegate to downstream jobsThis may not be a negative trend - it reflects an architectural pattern where orchestration agents quickly validate and dispatch work to specialized handlers.
Success Factors ✅
Based on analysis of 18 sessions with available logs:
1. Zero Failure Rate
2. Specialized Agent Distribution
3. Efficient Quick Validation
Failure Signals⚠️
1. Completion Rate Collapse (Critical)
2. Increased Session Duration
3. Loop Detection in Long Sessions
4. Limited Log Availability
Prompt Quality Analysis 📝
Based on 18 sessions with logs:
Quality Distribution
High-Quality Prompt Characteristics
Found in successful orchestration sessions:
Low-Quality Prompt Characteristics
Found in the session with loops:
Notable Observations
Workflow Architecture Pattern
The data reveals a two-tier orchestration architecture:
Tier 1 - Fast Validators (0 min duration, action_required)
Tier 2 - Worker Agents (longer duration, success/failure)
This explains the low completion rate - Tier 1 agents intentionally return
action_requiredto trigger Tier 2.Loop Detection Details
Session 21539560971 (Running Copilot coding agent):
Session 21539809108 (CI):
Tool Usage
Observation: No tool usage detected in orchestration workflows.
This is expected - orchestration agents don't call tools directly. They evaluate inputs and route to appropriate handlers. The actual tool usage happens in the triggered downstream workflows.
Historical Trends (Last 16 Days)
Completion Rate Volatility
The completion rate shows high variability (0% to 47.6%), suggesting different types of workflow days:
Duration Trend
Recent duration spikes:
Higher durations correlate with complex multi-step tasks requiring extensive analysis and iteration.
Loop Detection Trend
The decline in loop detection is positive, suggesting improved efficiency.
Actionable Recommendations
For Users Writing Task Descriptions
1. Provide Explicit Context for Worker Agents
When writing tasks that will be executed by worker agents (not just validators):
Key Insights Summary
Understanding the Architecture
The data reveals that most sessions are orchestration agents, not worker agents. The 98% action_required rate is by design - these agents validate inputs and route to appropriate handlers.
The Real Story
What Needs Attention
Next Steps
Analysis generated automatically on 2026-01-31
Historical data: 16 days (2026-01-15 to 2026-01-31)
Sessions analyzed: 50 (18 with logs)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions