[Auto-Triage] Auto-Triage Report - 2026-02-07 #14252
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-02-14T01:33:19.273Z.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🏷️ Auto-Triage Report Summary
Report Period: 2026-02-07 01:30 UTC
Issues Processed: 5
Labels Applied: 11 total labels
Still Unlabeled: 3 issues (closed or not requiring labels)
Success Rate: 100% (all open unlabeled issues successfully labeled)
Key Metrics
Classification Summary
View Detailed Classification Analysis
Detailed Breakdown
Issue #14247 - Smoke Test: Copilot - 21771444563:
testing(test report),automation(automated workflow)Issue #14245 - Terminal Stylist Analysis: Console Output Patterns Review:
documentation(analysis report),refactoring(code improvement suggestions)Issue #14243 - [PR Triage Report] PR Triage Report - 2026-02-07:
automation(automated workflow report)Issue #14241 - [agentics] CI Failure Doctor failed:
bug(workflow failure),automation(automated workflow),workflows(workflow system)Issue #14239 - [CI Failure Doctor] Integration Workflow Misc Part 2 fails without obvious error:
bug(test failure),testing(integration tests),workflows(workflow package)Label Distribution
View Label Statistics
By Category:
Total Labels Applied: 11 labels across 5 issues (2.2 labels per issue average)
Issues with Multiple Labels: 5/5 (100%)
Recommendations
Automation Issues Trend: 60% of unlabeled issues are automation-related (smoke tests, triage reports, workflow failures). Consider adding automatic labels to known automation workflows when they create issues.
CI/Test Failures: 40% of issues involve CI or test failures. These should potentially trigger alerts for immediate attention given they may block development.
Label Consistency: All processed issues fit cleanly into existing label categories with high confidence, suggesting the current label taxonomy is well-structured.
Closed Issues: Issues 🔧 Refactor repository checks in interactive workflows #14246, Update MCP Gateway to v0.0.107 #14244, Fix strict mode tests using deprecated anonymous bash syntax #14242, and Smoke Test: Copilot - 21768680779 #14240 were already closed and did not require labeling.
Confidence Assessment
needs-triageProgress Toward Goals
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions