[Auto-Triage] 🏷️ Auto-Triage Report - 2026-02-10

[github-actions[bot]]

Report Period: February 10, 2026 19:24 UTC
Issues Processed: 1
Labels Applied: 2 total labels
Still Unlabeled: 0 issues

Key Metrics

• Success Rate: 100% (issues successfully labeled)
• Average Confidence: High
• Most Common Classifications: documentation (1), enhancement (1)

Classification Summary

Issue	Applied Labels	Confidence	Key Reasoning
#14816	documentation, enhancement	High	Documentation review from Claude Code user perspective with improvement suggestions

View Detailed Classification Analysis

Detailed Breakdown

Issue #14816: 🔍 Claude Code User Documentation Review - 2026-02-10

• Keywords Detected: "Documentation Review", "Claude Code User", structured report format
• Pattern Match: Typical documentation audit/review structure with suggestions for improvements
• Similar Issues: Documentation improvement and user feedback patterns
• Confidence Score: 95%
• Classification Logic:
  • Title explicitly contains "Documentation Review" → documentation label
  • Structured review with suggestions for improvements → enhancement label
  • Focus on user perspective indicates UX/presentation feedback

Label Distribution

View Label Statistics

• documentation: 1 issue (100% of processed)
• enhancement: 1 issue (100% of processed)

Repository Health Assessment

Triage Coverage: During this run, most open issues in the 14804-14823 range already had appropriate labels. The repository demonstrates strong labeling practices with:

• Automated labeling from workflow reports (automation, report, triage labels)
• Component-specific labels (cookie, quick-win, improvement)
• Clear categorization of CI failures and documentation tasks

Unlabeled Issue Rate: Minimal - only 1 unlabeled issue found among recent issues, indicating effective triage coverage.

Recommendations

• Continue automated triage: The current automated triage workflows are working well
• Monitor documentation issues: Issue 🔍 Claude Code User Documentation Review - 2026-02-10 #14816 highlights user experience feedback on documentation presentation - consider creating a systematic approach to documentation review issues
• Maintain labeling standards: Current labeling practices are effective; continue applying multiple relevant labels when appropriate

Confidence Assessment

• Overall Success: High - Successfully classified and labeled the only unlabeled issue found
• Human Review Needed: 0 issues flagged with needs-triage
• Next Steps: Monitor for new unlabeled issues in the next scheduled run (6 hours)

---

References:

• §21879169998

AI generated by Auto-Triage Issues

• expires on Feb 17, 2026, 7:27 PM UTC

[github-actions[bot]]

This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-02-17T19:27:42.176Z.

Closed by Workflow