🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - October 12, 2025 (Evening) #1620
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 1 month ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - October 12, 2025 (Evening)
Audit Summary
🎉 System Health: EXCELLENT
All workflows completed successfully with 100% success rate. This represents a significant improvement from earlier audits today:
Missing Tools
Status: ✅ NONE
No missing tool reports were detected in any workflow run. All required tools are available and functioning correctly.
Error Analysis
False Positive Error Detection Issue
Total "Errors" Reported: 96
Actual Runtime Errors: 0
Issue Description: The error validation system is incorrectly flagging 96 instances as "errors," but these are all false positives. The pattern matching is detecting error-related keywords in:
Validation script code (
validate_errors.cjs)} catch (error) {error instanceof ErrorConfiguration output
GITHUB_AW_ERROR_PATTERNSconfiguration"access denied.*only authorized")JSONL log format
agent-stdio.logcontaining "error" in JSON keysExamples of False Positives
} catch (error) {error instanceof Error"connection failed""authentication failed"Impact
MCP Server Failures
Status: ✅ NONE
No MCP server connection failures or issues detected.
Performance Metrics
Cost Analysis
Token Usage
Workflow Efficiency
Changeset Generator
Tidy
Tool Usage Analysis
Top tools used across all workflows:
githubTodoWritesafe_outputsReadWriteHistorical Context
Comparison to Previous Audits
24-Hour Trend: 🟢 Positive
The evening audit shows continued system improvement with the highest success rate of the day and improved cost efficiency.
Notable Improvements
Recommendations
Priority: Medium
Fix False Positive Error Detection
The error validation script needs improvement to exclude false positives:
Recommended Changes:
*.cjs,validate_errors.js)GITHUB_AW_ERROR_PATTERNSagent-stdio.logExpected Impact: Reduce false positive count from 96 to ~0-5 actual errors per audit
Priority: Low
Continue Monitoring
System health is excellent. Continue daily audits to maintain visibility and track trends.
Affected Workflows
No workflows are experiencing actual errors or issues. All 14 runs completed successfully:
Next Steps
Audit Timestamp: 2025-10-12T22:01:00Z
Audit Agent: Agentic Workflow Audit Agent v1.0
Data Location:
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/audits/2025-10-12-evening.jsonSummary
🎉 Excellent system health with 100% success rate and improving cost efficiency. The only issue identified is false positive error detection, which has no impact on actual workflow operations. System is performing optimally.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions