You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Regulatory analysis covering 29 daily report discussions created in the last 24 hours (2026-02-20 20:00 UTC → 2026-02-21 20:02 UTC). Overall repository health is good, with strong security posture (100% redaction/permissions coverage), excellent test coverage (2.33x ratio), and healthy PR velocity (86% merge rate). Two critical observability gaps require attention: a gateway.jsonl artifact naming mismatch (100% miss rate on MCP logging) and a data integrity error in today's Secrets Analysis report where the headline total metric (3,475) contradicts the per-secret table values (sum > 5,394).
The Safe Output system is functioning at 88.9% success rate after a resolved push_to_pull_request_branch bug. The 0% discussion answer rate and 4× Auto-Triage duplicate runs are persistent process issues that warrant follow-up.
🚨 Critical Findings
[DATA INTEGRITY] Secrets Analysis Feb 21 total metric is wrong — The headline Total secrets.* References: 3,475 contradicts the per-secret table (top-10 alone sum to 5,394). Feb 20 report was internally consistent (claimed 5,259, top-10 = 5,223). Likely a computation bug introduced in today's secrets report generation.
[OBSERVABILITY] MCP gateway.jsonl artifact naming violation — All 20 MCP-enabled runs (100%) are missing gateway.jsonl. The file rpc-messages.jsonl is present in 100% of runs, indicating a packaging/naming mismatch rather than missing telemetry. The required artifact contract is not being met.
Expected: ~5,400+ (sum of 24 individual secret counts)
Actual (claimed): 3,475
Evidence: Top-10 secrets alone sum to 1,827+1,781+903+516+190+75+75+15+6+6 = 5,394. The claim of 3,475 is mathematically impossible.
Feb 20 baseline was correct: 5,259 claimed, top-10 = 5,223 (consistent within ~0.7%)
Scope Analysis: Same scope (all .lock.yml files) — this is a true data error, not a scope difference
Severity: High — the headline metric is misleading
Recommended Action: Investigate the secrets counting script for a regression introduced since Feb 20. May be a deduplication bug or incorrect aggregation.
Quality: ✅ Valid
1,415 requests, 741 allowed (52.4%). 674 blocked — 667 are internal TCP/CONNECT noise. Only 2 real external domains blocked: github.com:443 and proxy.golang.org:443. Both are legitimate dev services that need allowlisting.
Quality: ✅ Valid
433,306 Go LOC, quality score 76/100 (down 2 from 78). High churn score (3/15) reflects active development rather than instability. Test coverage perfect (30/30).
Quality: ✅ Valid
157 lock files, ~10.1 MB total. 93% in 50–100 KB range — highly consistent compilation output. Confirms lockfile count across reports.
💡 Recommendations
Process Improvements
Fix secrets count computation: Audit the secrets-analysis workflow for the regression that caused today's incorrect total (3,475 vs ~5,400 expected). Compare the counting script between the Feb 20 and Feb 21 runs.
Standardize MCP artifact name: Align rpc-messages.jsonl → gateway.jsonl (or update the observability contract). This is blocking 100% of MCP observability auditing.
Reduce Auto-Triage frequency: 4 runs/day is excessive and creates discussion noise. Consider rate-limiting to 1–2 runs daily or batching by a configurable schedule.
Data Quality Actions
Add internal consistency check to secrets report: Before publishing, validate that Total secrets.* References ≥ sum of top-10 entries. Fail the report if not.
Investigate Issue Monster firewall logging: 7 consecutive runs missing access.log for this workflow. Likely a structural workflow configuration issue that needs a targeted fix.
Monitor agent success rate: Track the Feb 21 daily agent analysis when it publishes. If the 65.6% rate (Feb 20) persists, investigate task complexity trends or environment regressions.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Regulatory analysis covering 29 daily report discussions created in the last 24 hours (2026-02-20 20:00 UTC → 2026-02-21 20:02 UTC). Overall repository health is good, with strong security posture (100% redaction/permissions coverage), excellent test coverage (2.33x ratio), and healthy PR velocity (86% merge rate). Two critical observability gaps require attention: a
gateway.jsonlartifact naming mismatch (100% miss rate on MCP logging) and a data integrity error in today's Secrets Analysis report where the headline total metric (3,475) contradicts the per-secret table values (sum > 5,394).The Safe Output system is functioning at 88.9% success rate after a resolved
push_to_pull_request_branchbug. The 0% discussion answer rate and 4× Auto-Triage duplicate runs are persistent process issues that warrant follow-up.🚨 Critical Findings
[DATA INTEGRITY] Secrets Analysis Feb 21 total metric is wrong — The headline
Total secrets.* References: 3,475contradicts the per-secret table (top-10 alone sum to 5,394). Feb 20 report was internally consistent (claimed 5,259, top-10 = 5,223). Likely a computation bug introduced in today's secrets report generation.[OBSERVABILITY] MCP
gateway.jsonlartifact naming violation — All 20 MCP-enabled runs (100%) are missinggateway.jsonl. The filerpc-messages.jsonlis present in 100% of runs, indicating a packaging/naming mismatch rather than missing telemetry. The required artifact contract is not being met.📋 Full Regulatory Report
📊 Reports Reviewed
🔍 Data Consistency Analysis
Cross-Report Metrics Comparison
.lock.yml.lock.yml.lock.yml.lock.yml.lock.yml.lock.ymlConsistency Score
🔴 Critical Issues
1. Secrets Analysis Report: Headline Total Contradicts Per-Secret Table (Feb 21)
total_secrets_references(see glossary).lock.ymlfiles) — this is a true data error, not a scope difference2. MCP Gateway Artifact Naming Mismatch (Observability)
mcp_enabled_workflowswithgateway.jsonlcoveragegateway.jsonlartifactrpc-messages.jsonlpresent in 100% of runs.gateway.jsonlrpc-messages.jsonl→gateway.jsonl, or update the observability contract to userpc-messages.jsonl.3. Auto-Triage Running 4× Per Day
4. Copilot Agent Success Rate Decline
5. Firewall Run Count Minor Discrepancy
6. access.log Missing from 8 Firewall Runs
access.logartifacts📈 Trend Analysis
Notable Trends
📝 Per-Report Highlights
Daily Secrets Analysis #17552
Quality:⚠️ Data integrity issue
Top finding: 24 unique secret types, 100% redaction and permissions. Critical bug: headline total (3,475) contradicts per-secret table (5,394+ from top-10 alone). Investigation required.
Daily Performance Summary #17550
Quality: ✅ Valid
86 of 100 PRs merged (86%), avg 1.1h merge time. Issues: 950/1000 closed (95%). Persistent issue: 0% discussion answer rate. Note: these are samples (90-day window capped at 100 items), not full-repository counts.
Observability Coverage #17416
Quality: 🔴 Critical issues
gateway.jsonl0% coverage (naming mismatch),access.log71.4% coverage (8 runs missing). Both require remediation.Safe Output Health #17389
Quality:⚠️ Issues (resolved)
88.9% success rate. 2 failures from
push_to_pull_request_branchbug (invalid branch ref17284/merge). Resolved in Run #4. Monitoring recommended.Daily Firewall Report #17355
Quality: ✅ Valid
1,415 requests, 741 allowed (52.4%). 674 blocked — 667 are internal TCP/CONNECT noise. Only 2 real external domains blocked:
github.com:443andproxy.golang.org:443. Both are legitimate dev services that need allowlisting.Daily Code Metrics #17451
Quality: ✅ Valid
433,306 Go LOC, quality score 76/100 (down 2 from 78). High churn score (3/15) reflects active development rather than instability. Test coverage perfect (30/30).
Lockfile Statistics #17531
Quality: ✅ Valid
157 lock files, ~10.1 MB total. 93% in 50–100 KB range — highly consistent compilation output. Confirms lockfile count across reports.
💡 Recommendations
Process Improvements
Fix secrets count computation: Audit the
secrets-analysisworkflow for the regression that caused today's incorrect total (3,475 vs ~5,400 expected). Compare the counting script between the Feb 20 and Feb 21 runs.Standardize MCP artifact name: Align
rpc-messages.jsonl→gateway.jsonl(or update the observability contract). This is blocking 100% of MCP observability auditing.Reduce Auto-Triage frequency: 4 runs/day is excessive and creates discussion noise. Consider rate-limiting to 1–2 runs daily or batching by a configurable schedule.
Data Quality Actions
Add internal consistency check to secrets report: Before publishing, validate that
Total secrets.* References≥ sum of top-10 entries. Fail the report if not.Investigate Issue Monster firewall logging: 7 consecutive runs missing
access.logfor this workflow. Likely a structural workflow configuration issue that needs a targeted fix.Monitor agent success rate: Track the Feb 21 daily agent analysis when it publishes. If the 65.6% rate (Feb 20) persists, investigate task complexity trends or environment regressions.
📊 Regulatory Metrics
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions