Replies: 3 comments
-
|
/q remove "Notes and Observations" section. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Agentic Q triggered by this discussion comment. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 1 month ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
GitHub MCP Remote Server Tools Report
Generated: 2025-10-20
MCP Mode: Remote
Toolsets: All
Previous Report: 2025-10-19
Executive Summary
Inconsistency Detection
Toolset Integrity Checks
After systematic exploration of all available tools across the expected 18 toolsets, the following findings were identified:
Tool Organization: ✅ All tools are properly categorized with no detected inconsistencies.
Notable Observation:⚠️ Only 5 of the 18 expected toolsets have tools available in remote mode:
Toolsets with Tools (5):
repos- 17 toolsissues- 13 toolspull_requests- 13 toolsusers- 4 toolslabels- 2 toolsToolsets with No Exposed Tools (13):
context- No tools available in remote modeactions- No tools available in remote modecode_security- No tools available in remote modedependabot- No tools available in remote modediscussions- No tools available in remote modeexperiments- No tools available in remote modegists- No tools available in remote modenotifications- No tools available in remote modeorgs- No tools available in remote modeprojects- No tools available in remote modesecret_protection- No tools available in remote modesecurity_advisories- No tools available in remote modestargazers- No tools available in remote modeThese toolsets may be available in local mode or may be added in future versions of the GitHub MCP server.
Changes Since Last Report
Comparing the current tools inventory (2025-10-20) with the previous report (2025-10-19):
No tools were added, removed, or moved since the last report.
The tool inventory remains stable at 49 tools across 5 toolsets with identical categorization.
Tools by Toolset
repos Toolset (17 tools)
Core repository operations including file management, commits, branches, tags, and releases. Required for most GitHub operations.
Example Use Cases:
issues Toolset (13 tools)
Comprehensive issue management including creation, updates, comments, sub-issues, and search. Critical for issue tracking workflows.
Example Use Cases:
pull_requests Toolset (13 tools)
Complete pull request workflow including creation, review, merging, and management. Essential for code review workflows.
Example Use Cases:
users Toolset (4 tools)
User and team information for authentication context and collaboration. Useful for understanding who the agent is working as.
Example Use Cases:
labels Toolset (2 tools)
Label management for organizing issues and pull requests. Small toolset with practical value.
Example Use Cases:
Recommended Default Toolsets
Based on the analysis of available tools and their usage patterns, the following toolsets are recommended as defaults when no toolset is specified:
Recommended Defaults:
repos,issues,pull_requests,users,labelsRationale:
Changes from Current Defaults:
context: This toolset has no tools available in remote mode, making it ineffective as a default. Including it only creates confusion.labels: Small toolset (only 2 tools) that provides useful label management functionality without significant overhead. Commonly used for organizing issues and PRs.Specialized Toolsets (enable explicitly when needed):
actions,code_security,dependabot,discussions,experiments,gists,notifications,orgs,projects,secret_protection,security_advisories,stargazersToolset Configuration Reference
When configuring the GitHub MCP server in agentic workflows, you can enable specific toolsets:
YAML Configuration:
Using All Toolsets:
Custom Toolset Selection:
Available toolset options:
repos- Repository operations (17 tools)issues- Issue management (13 tools)pull_requests- Pull request operations (13 tools)users- User information (4 tools)labels- Label management (2 tools)all- Enable all toolsetsNote: The following toolsets are documented but have no tools in remote mode:
context,actions,code_security,dependabot,discussions,experiments,gists,notifications,orgs,projects,secret_protection,security_advisories,stargazersNotes and Observations
Key Findings
Stable Tool Inventory: The tool inventory has remained stable since the last report (2025-10-19) with no additions, removals, or changes. This indicates a mature, stable API.
Limited Toolset Availability: Only 5 of 18 expected toolsets have tools available in remote mode. This represents approximately 28% of the documented toolsets. The remaining 13 toolsets may be:
Toolset Size Distribution:
repos,issues,pull_requestsusers,labelsComprehensive Coverage: Despite only 5 active toolsets, the 49 available tools provide comprehensive coverage of core GitHub operations:
Default Toolsets Optimization: By removing the non-functional
contexttoolset and adding the smalllabelstoolset, we improve the default configuration to only include functional tools while maintaining comprehensive coverage.Best Practices
Start with Defaults: The recommended default toolsets (
repos,issues,pull_requests,users,labels) provide excellent coverage for most workflows.Explicit Toolset Selection: For specialized workflows, explicitly specify only the toolsets you need to minimize initialization overhead.
Monitor for Updates: As the GitHub MCP server evolves, additional toolsets may become available. Check for updates regularly.
Security Considerations: Consider using read-only mode when agents only need to fetch information, not modify resources.
Future Recommendations
Monitor Additional Toolsets: Watch for tools being added to currently empty toolsets like
actions,discussions,gists,notifications,orgs, andprojects.Documentation Updates: As new toolsets become available, update the default toolsets if they provide commonly needed functionality.
Performance Testing: Conduct performance testing to understand the overhead of enabling additional toolsets when they become available.
Methodology
[Content truncated due to length]
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions