[Issue Arborist] Daily Linking Report - 2025-11-28 #5000
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
⚓ Avast! This discussion be marked as outdated by Issue Arborist. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🌳 Issue Arborist Daily Report
Date: 2025-11-28
Issues Analyzed: 20
Links Created
Potential Relationships (For Manual Review)
#4997(Schema parity parent tracker) ↔#4970-#4974(schema parity tasks) — medium confidence: the parent issue enumerates these tasks explicitly, but they predate this 20-issue window and may already have existing links; confirm before linking to avoid duplicates.#4997vs#4998— high confidence (duplicate): both issues share identical text, goals, and checklists. Consider closing one or converting to a single parent issue before attempting sub-issue links.#4835,#4834,#4833— medium confidence: each references discussion#4826and targets adjacent sections of the guide. If maintainers want a single tracking issue for Quick Start UX polish, these could become sub-issues once that parent exists.#4664,#4663,#4662,#4661,#4660— low confidence: all spawned from the CLI Consistency Checker and touch related help-text polish, but each is currently scoped to one command. Creating a broader “CLI consistency polish” parent might help if additional findings arrive.Observations
no:parent-issueitems originated from automated analyzers (Duplicate Code Detector, CLI Consistency Checker, Q Workflow Optimizer, smoke tests). These tend to be tightly scoped and already resolved, which limits safe linking opportunities.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions