Is there any replacement for unsafe_coerce? #4223
Unanswered
RudolfVonKrugstein
asked this question in
Questions & support
Replies: 1 comment
-
There is not, no. Only sound APIs are exposed now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
I just noticed, that in newer version of
gleam_stdlib
thedynamic.unsafe_coerce
function has been removed.I am using
process.selecting_record2
in a context, where I knoe the incoming data is of a specific type in gleam, but I have no Idea how to convert theDynamic
to the specific gleam type.Is there a replacement for
unsafe_coerce
that I am not seeing? Or another way of doing this?Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions