You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The referenced packages are out of date and do not seem to have been updated in a long time.
I have executed dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive from the command line for my project, at request of security team.
It lists the versions of System.Text.RegularExpressions & System.Net.Http (both 4.3.0) as vulnerable. These are include from GlobalPay.API package, as part of NetStandard.Library (1.6.11)
Can the GlobalPay.API package be updated to reference non-vulnerable package versions ? Is there a version that does not reference NetStandard.Library ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for bringing this up! I’m also encountering the same issue with GlobalPay.API referencing older, vulnerable versions of System.Text.RegularExpressions and System.Net.Http. As you mentioned, updating these dependencies would be very beneficial from a security standpoint.
It would be great if the maintainers could prioritize an update or consider a version of GlobalPay.API that doesn’t depend on NetStandard.Library (or at least includes a more recent version). This would help a lot with compliance in environments that require up-to-date security practices.
The referenced packages are out of date and do not seem to have been updated in a long time.
I have executed
dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive
from the command line for my project, at request of security team.It lists the versions of
System.Text.RegularExpressions
&System.Net.Http
(both 4.3.0) as vulnerable. These are include fromGlobalPay.API
package, as part ofNetStandard.Library (1.6.11)
Can the
GlobalPay.API
package be updated to reference non-vulnerable package versions ? Is there a version that does not referenceNetStandard.Library
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: