Skip to content

Conversation

@Marcono1234
Copy link
Contributor

Follow-up for #2950

The comment still used the old class name, before the class was renamed, see #2950 (comment).

(Sorry for the confusion the separate review comments on that previous PR might have caused.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants