Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TanStack Router support #777

Open
aconrad opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

TanStack Router support #777

aconrad opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
feature Request a new feature

Comments

@aconrad
Copy link

aconrad commented Jan 6, 2025

Description

Add support for TanStack Router integration, an alternative to React Router.

Context

There is currently support for React Router v6 or v4/v5.x. TanStack Router is gaining popularity and it would be nice to be able to support users that use this newer router alternative.

@aconrad aconrad added the feature Request a new feature label Jan 6, 2025
@aconrad
Copy link
Author

aconrad commented Feb 20, 2025

Any guidance or pointers on getting started?

I'm integrating Faro into my React + TanStack Router app but am new to both Faro and the Grafana stack.

I’d like to understand the benefits of passing { router: ... } to new ReactIntegration(). What additional functionality does this provide compared to not passing it?

For creating a TanStack Router integration with Faro, I assume the goal is to allow Faro to extract useful information from the router when emitting events to the collector—does that sound right? What kind of information does Faro need, and what interface does it expect to interact with in order to extract this data?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Request a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant