Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Log4j Vuln #94

Open
ertugrulturan opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Log4j Vuln #94

ertugrulturan opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@ertugrulturan
Copy link

ertugrulturan commented Jan 25, 2024

Log4j 1.2 to 1.2.17
image
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.x/ <- eol + vulned version

@ertugrulturan ertugrulturan changed the title CVE-2019-17571 and CVE-2022-23305 Log4j Jan 25, 2024
@ertugrulturan ertugrulturan changed the title Log4j Log4j Vuln Jan 25, 2024
@TommyTran732
Copy link

@h-mdm Any chance you can take a look at https://reload4j.qos.ch/?

It should be a drop in replacement for log4j 1.2.17, so you don't need to update the code base. The vuln is quite dangerous so it would be great to just have this as a quick fix for now.

@h-mdm
Copy link
Owner

h-mdm commented Jun 10, 2024

I have implemented an exploit of CVE-2021-44228 mentioned in https://www.lunasec.io/docs/blog/log4j-zero-day/, and it didn't work. The line ${jndi:ldap://127.0.0.1/a} is logged as it is, no attempt to remote access by JNDI is done. So I believe the vulnerability CVE-2021-44228 is not applicable for Headwind MDM (probably because only text loggers are used).

@TommyTran732
Copy link

I still think it is pretty bad to keep using this old version though. It is not the only known CVE for it. I don't see any harm in at bumping to reload4j. The MDM is security critical so I'd prefer if theres no known vulnerable dependencies.

@TommyTran732
Copy link

I'd like to add that I scanned the dependences and there are a lot of known vulnerabilities as well. Some are several years old. The log4j is just the most iffy one.

@h-mdm
Copy link
Owner

h-mdm commented Jun 10, 2024

Thank you for the info, will work on that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants