Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

TestEquality #16

Closed
jonascarpay opened this issue Dec 13, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

TestEquality #16

jonascarpay opened this issue Dec 13, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@jonascarpay
Copy link
Contributor

jonascarpay commented Dec 13, 2019 •
edited
Loading

What is the/is there a difference between GEq and TestEquality? I see you use it internally, is it just to avoid orphans?
@phadej
Copy link
Collaborator

phadej commented Dec 13, 2019

See obsidiansystems/dependent-sum#31

@phadej phadej closed this as completed Dec 13, 2019
@Ericson2314
Copy link
Contributor

Ericson2314 commented Dec 2, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Depending on the outcome of haskell/core-libraries-committee#21, TestEquality may be valid super class of GEq we could add.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@phadej @Ericson2314 @jonascarpay