peer review of analyses prior to acceptance

[moudon]

I agree that we do need to think about and devise "a mechanism for peer review of analyses prior to acceptance into the Global Observatory of Healthy and Sustainable Cities,"

[carlhiggs]

Thanks for opening this issue Anne, as per discussion #278 , I believe @mdlowe @deeptiadlakha are also developing a protocol for this for the policy review. It would be great to see if we could coordinate these somehow, as there may be some overlaps in the process. Let's leave this issue open as a reminder to continue this discussion :)

[moudon]

Hello Carl et al. We definitely want to link the policy and spatial indicator reviews. Keeping the issue open until we have multiple applications within a short period of time makes sense—we want and can handle more participants! Anne Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows From: Carl ***@***.***> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 6:10 PM To: ***@***.***> Cc: Anne Vernez ***@***.***>; State ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [global-healthy-liveable-cities/global-indicators] peer review of analyses prior to acceptance (Issue #279) Thanks for opening this issue Anne, as per discussion #278<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/global-healthy-liveable-cities/global-indicators/discussions/278__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!jrvZdy4-F1DDmPpf-WMoYrigSRJ8Qj5BMdpBzL9UGlu_j7kmH5bzDWyJL-7wegYcZQHCif5zJOw0dHHAq-UkaA$> , I believe @mdlowe<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/mdlowe__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!jrvZdy4-F1DDmPpf-WMoYrigSRJ8Qj5BMdpBzL9UGlu_j7kmH5bzDWyJL-7wegYcZQHCif5zJOw0dHFRckSk6A$> @deeptiadlakha<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/deeptiadlakha__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!jrvZdy4-F1DDmPpf-WMoYrigSRJ8Qj5BMdpBzL9UGlu_j7kmH5bzDWyJL-7wegYcZQHCif5zJOw0dHHV3p2WHg$> are also developing a protocol for this for the policy review. It would be great to see if we could coordinate these somehow, as there may be some overlaps in the process. Let's leave this issue open as a reminder to continue this discussion :) — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/global-healthy-liveable-cities/global-indicators/issues/279*issuecomment-1548823888__;Iw!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!jrvZdy4-F1DDmPpf-WMoYrigSRJ8Qj5BMdpBzL9UGlu_j7kmH5bzDWyJL-7wegYcZQHCif5zJOw0dHHHNcAJaA$>, or unsubscribe<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A547XT2HG6A7JI3BEKHUPFTXGLHVPANCNFSM6AAAAAAYCOTTVU__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!jrvZdy4-F1DDmPpf-WMoYrigSRJ8Qj5BMdpBzL9UGlu_j7kmH5bzDWyJL-7wegYcZQHCif5zJOw0dHEBcnFhWg$>. You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[carlhiggs]

@MelanieLowe I'm going through some of our older issues, and this is an interesting one. Ties in with broader strategic discussions I know you and Erica are having for the GOHSC. Do we have a current formal protocol, or should we look to put one on our wiki in the coming year so this is publicly recorded?