Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Are the Shannon Entropy and similar metrics calculated by powerTCR robust against sequencing depth? #4

Open
johan-gson opened this issue Nov 19, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@johan-gson
Copy link

Hi @hillarykoch,

I'm trying to compare the TCR repertoires from a bunch of samples, and the number of cells per sample vary from ~350 to ~4000. I tested powerTCR on these samples, and to my understanding this works, I understand that the distances between samples are not biased by the number of cells per sample. So, I can see that samples group the way I expected, but I also want to do a statistical test of a metric that represents something that people know what it is, such as Shannon Entropy. What I don't get is if that is sensitive to sequencing depth, or if that somehow is compensated for in your model? Could you give some advice on a suitable metric?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant