-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Smart contract governance #1
Comments
Yes, happy for any suggestions going forward. Documentation with sample code is in the works. It's just been a couple of stressful weeks |
@hiveben In my opinion the ownership of the contract should be delegated to a group of interested parties. Every deployment should have a multi-sig transaction that needs to be approved by at least 2 thirds of the parties. |
@jandrad agreed. We can add you and Atomichub might agree as well. Probably also the WAX team itself |
@hiveben it should be the parties actually interested in using the contract so we don't end up in a situation where things cannot move forward. |
@jandrad I think WAX is very interested for their own place. Atomichub probably not as much, but they agreed to support pushing verifications. |
@hiveben if there is support for that then it would work. |
In order to create a fully decentralized contract, proper governance must be defined.
Key points to consider:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: