Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 14, 2024. It is now read-only.

Should PuTTY be an option for Windows users on the course? #23

Open
mattagape opened this issue Jul 7, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Should PuTTY be an option for Windows users on the course? #23

mattagape opened this issue Jul 7, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@mattagape
Copy link
Contributor

As was mentioned in issue #22, there are some problems with PuTTY.

Specifically, although it is a great tool for Windows users to access a remote Unix server, it does not have the ability to act in a Unix-like way on a user's local Windows PC.

This issue is to act as a placeholder to discuss this. Should we recommend PuTTY or something(s) else?

@tkphd
Copy link
Member

tkphd commented Jul 7, 2020

I think we should recommend using Git for Windows, since it's a full-featured terminal already used in the Software Carpentries workshops. PuTTY is an excellent small utility, but bash provides users/learners with a lot more flexibility.

Related to carpentries-incubator/hpc-intro#20

@psteinb
Copy link
Member

psteinb commented Jul 7, 2020

Agreed, I think keeping the ties to other carpentry material is a good idea. Let’s stick with the recommendations of shell-novice as they don’t compromise our material in any way.

@mattagape
Copy link
Contributor Author

There is some support on Windows for Linux, e.g.

I'm not sure if this is just for Windows 10 though. Similarly there are more flavours in the Windows App Store, but again I'm not sure which versions of Windows can use them.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants