Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unknown CLscientificWeight #205

Closed
edvinf opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Unknown CLscientificWeight #205

edvinf opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@edvinf
Copy link
Contributor

edvinf commented Apr 10, 2024

How does one deal with unknown scientific weights in the CL table?

I do not want to indicate that the official weight is fit for use without having some explicit consideration behind it, so I have adopted the convention of setting scientific weight to 0 for species where I know there may be issues with official weights, or where I have not been able to explicitly consider the applicability of official weights.

If this is the recommended approach, I think it would be nice to have a code to indicate it in either CLExplainDifference, or CLdataTypeOfScientificWeight.

Another option could be to have the value "Unknown" accepted, as is done for CLlandingsValue.

@HenrikK-N
Copy link
Collaborator

The Core Group suggest in this case to enter the official weight in the scientific weight, because the scientific weight is the weight used in the assessment (the most important weight), therefore the scientific weight should be filled in, with the best known weight. If the weight is doubtful, it is suggested to mark it using the filed CLscientificWeightQualitativeBias and indicate if the scientific weight is highly overestimated (using '+++') or highly underestimated (using '---').

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants