You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Brief description
An improvement of documentation to ensure the consistent use of 'Zenith Distance' vs 'Zenith Angle' for Type V measures.
Background [CHANGE OR DELETE IF NOT APPLICABLE]
DynAdjust v1.2.7
Current documentation appears to use 'Zenith Distance' and 'Zenith Angle' interchangeably.
Or, at very least to apply both terms to the Type V measurement.
See for example, among other:
Section 7.2.12
Section 7.2.15
Section C.2 (import log)
Basic requirements
Adopt consistent terminology throughout documentation and code, for this quantity
I have not perused the literature to see which is preferred, but Zenith Distance (V) appears to be more prevalent in our literature.
[An interesting and surprising terminology for the un-initiated, and non-astronomers among us]
Priority
Priority 3 - low
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Brief description
An improvement of documentation to ensure the consistent use of 'Zenith Distance' vs 'Zenith Angle' for Type V measures.
Background [CHANGE OR DELETE IF NOT APPLICABLE]
DynAdjust v1.2.7
Current documentation appears to use 'Zenith Distance' and 'Zenith Angle' interchangeably.
Or, at very least to apply both terms to the Type V measurement.
See for example, among other:
Section 7.2.12
Section 7.2.15
Section C.2 (import log)
Basic requirements
Adopt consistent terminology throughout documentation and code, for this quantity
I have not perused the literature to see which is preferred, but Zenith Distance (V) appears to be more prevalent in our literature.
[An interesting and surprising terminology for the un-initiated, and non-astronomers among us]
Priority
Priority 3 - low
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: