Black-box test data overview for 003-rcv-test.yaml
title: Test Vote 003 (100 ballots)
choice avg choice rank Core STV Schulze RankedPairs Condorcet FACTIOUS 2.98000 (298/100) 1 1 / 1 1 / 1 1 / 1 1 (5) EVIL 3.70000 (370/100) 2 2 / 2 2 / 2 2 / 2 2 (4) ABNORMAL 4.44000 (444/100) 3 4 / 4 3 / 3 3 / 3 3 (3) BORING 4.50000 (450/100) 4 6 / 6 4 / 4 4 / 4 4 (2) CHAOTIC 4.61000 (461/100) 5 3 / 3 5 / 5 5 / 5 5 (1) DYSFUNCTIONAL 4.69000 (469/100) 6 5 / 5 6 / 6 6 / 6 6 (0)
1 seat available ● 100 ballots processed
Abbreviation Name/description Result FACTIOUS factious/divisive 1/selected EVIL evil villain 2/placed ABNORMAL abnormal and antisocial 3/placed BORING boring as anything 4/placed CHAOTIC chaotic unpredictable 5/placed DYSFUNCTIONAL dysfunctional incompetent 6/placed Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1.
Candidate average ranking FACTIOUS 2.98 EVIL 3.7 ABNORMAL 4.44 BORING 4.5 CHAOTIC 4.61 DYSFUNCTIONAL 4.69
1 seat available ● 100 ballots processed
Abbreviation Name/description Result FACTIOUS factious/divisive 1/selected EVIL evil villain 2/placed CHAOTIC chaotic unpredictable 3/placed ABNORMAL abnormal and antisocial 4/eliminated DYSFUNCTIONAL dysfunctional incompetent 5/eliminated BORING boring as anything 6/eliminated
Round # Quota FACTIOUS EVIL CHAOTIC ABNORMAL DYSFUNCTIONAL BORING 1 50 37 16 13 15 12 7 ❌ 2 49.5 39 19 14 15 12 ❌ ❌ 3 48 45 20 16 15 ❌ ❌ ❌ 4 46.5 51 ✅ 22 20 ❌ ❌ ❌ 5 22.94118 ✅ 24.91176 ✅ 20.97059 ❌ ❌ ❌ 6 10.71562 ✅ ✅ 21.43125 ✅ ❌ ❌ ❌ Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. This data is used for breaking ties in the primary voting method.
Candidate average ranking FACTIOUS 2.98 EVIL 3.7 ABNORMAL 4.44 BORING 4.5 CHAOTIC 4.61 DYSFUNCTIONAL 4.69
1 seat available ● 100 ballots processed
Abbreviation Name/description Result FACTIOUS factious/divisive 1/selected EVIL evil villain 2/placed ABNORMAL abnormal and antisocial 3/placed BORING boring as anything 4/placed CHAOTIC chaotic unpredictable 5/placed DYSFUNCTIONAL dysfunctional incompetent 6/placed This is a comparison of how each choice ranked against the others.
FACTIOUS EVIL ABNORMAL BORING CHAOTIC DYSFUNCTIONAL FACTIOUS 🛇 27 ✅ 44 ✅ 42 ✅ 43 ✅ 46 ✅ EVIL -27 ❌ 🛇 29 ✅ 25 ✅ 26 ✅ 31 ✅ ABNORMAL -44 ❌ -29 ❌ 🛇 8 ✅ 8 ✅ 7 ✅ BORING -42 ❌ -25 ❌ -8 ❌ 🛇 15 ✅ 11 ✅ CHAOTIC -43 ❌ -26 ❌ -8 ❌ -15 ❌ 🛇 3 ✅ DYSFUNCTIONAL -46 ❌ -31 ❌ -7 ❌ -11 ❌ -3 ❌ 🛇 Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. This data is used for breaking ties in the primary voting method.
Candidate average ranking FACTIOUS 2.98 EVIL 3.7 ABNORMAL 4.44 BORING 4.5 CHAOTIC 4.61 DYSFUNCTIONAL 4.69
1 seat available ● 100 ballots processed
Abbreviation Name/description Result FACTIOUS factious/divisive 1/selected EVIL evil villain 2/placed ABNORMAL abnormal and antisocial 3/placed BORING boring as anything 4/placed CHAOTIC chaotic unpredictable 5/placed DYSFUNCTIONAL dysfunctional incompetent 6/placed This is a comparison of how each choice ranked against the others.
FACTIOUS EVIL ABNORMAL BORING CHAOTIC DYSFUNCTIONAL FACTIOUS 🛇 27 ✅🔒 44 ✅🔒 42 ✅🔒 43 ✅🔒 46 ✅🔒 EVIL -27 ❌ 🛇 29 ✅🔒 25 ✅🔒 26 ✅🔒 31 ✅🔒 ABNORMAL -44 ❌ -29 ❌ 🛇 8 ✅🔒 8 ✅🔒 7 ✅🔒 BORING -42 ❌ -25 ❌ -8 ❌ 🛇 15 ✅🔒 11 ✅🔒 CHAOTIC -43 ❌ -26 ❌ -8 ❌ -15 ❌ 🛇 3 ✅🔒 DYSFUNCTIONAL -46 ❌ -31 ❌ -7 ❌ -11 ❌ -3 ❌ 🛇 Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. This data is used for breaking ties in the primary voting method.
Candidate average ranking FACTIOUS 2.98 EVIL 3.7 ABNORMAL 4.44 BORING 4.5 CHAOTIC 4.61 DYSFUNCTIONAL 4.69