You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Docker is proprietary software and requires a paid license in many cases. Even if institutions are not making commercial tools with their pygeoapi deployment, the license is not free and open source, and I am assuming that because of this, it may not be an option for some governments or institutions
However, containerization seems to be the best option for deploying pygeoapi
https://podman.io/ uses a similar API as Docker, so ideally we can use the same Dockerfiles, but it is free and open source
Thus it is likely to be a preferred option for some institutions.
However, it is bit less feature rich so we would need to test it a bit before documenting it.
Does this seem reasonable? Feel free to close if not or if I do not have the full context on deployment tools within our partner organizations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Docker is proprietary software and requires a paid license in many cases. Even if institutions are not making commercial tools with their pygeoapi deployment, the license is not free and open source, and I am assuming that because of this, it may not be an option for some governments or institutions
However, containerization seems to be the best option for deploying pygeoapi
https://podman.io/ uses a similar API as Docker, so ideally we can use the same Dockerfiles, but it is free and open source
Thus it is likely to be a preferred option for some institutions.
However, it is bit less feature rich so we would need to test it a bit before documenting it.
Does this seem reasonable? Feel free to close if not or if I do not have the full context on deployment tools within our partner organizations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: