Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ENS version with evaluable reinforcements in each security measure #1362

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2025

Conversation

thidalgosalvador
Copy link
Contributor

The file “ENS-decreto.xlsx” did not include the controls catalogued as reinforcements detailed in the security measures of Annex II. They were included in the comments of each measure together with the information of the Dimensions that applied to the measure and its application. And these reinforcements were not evaluable.

In the new version “ENS-RD-311-2020-con-Refuerzos.xlsx” the “reinforcements” controls are included as evaluable within each Annex II measure. There are a total of 134 additional controls to be taken into account in the audits, especially for the MEDIUM and HIGH categories.

Only the security measures detailed in Annex II have been left as evaluable.

The library_provider attribute has been updated to “Ministerio para la Transformación Digital y de la Función Pública - Gobierno de España”.

The file “ENS-decreto.xlsx” did not include the controls catalogued as reinforcements detailed in the security measures of Annex II. They were included in the comments of each measure together with the information of the Dimensions that applied to the measure and its application. And these reinforcements were not evaluable.

In the new version “ENS-RD-311-2020-con-Refuerzos.xlsx” the “reinforcements” controls are included as evaluable within each Annex II measure. There are a total of 134 additional controls to be taken into account in the audits, especially for the MEDIUM and HIGH categories.

Only the security measures detailed in Annex II have been left as evaluable.

The library_provider attribute has been updated to “Ministerio para la Transformación Digital y de la Función Pública - Gobierno de España”.
@eric-intuitem
Copy link
Collaborator

eric-intuitem commented Jan 17, 2025

There are 3 lines that are assessable but without a ref_id: 1030, 1041, and 1109. Could we either make them not assessable (1109), or add a ref_id? This would make compatibility straightforward,
what do you think @thidalgosalvador ?

@thidalgosalvador
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @eric-intuitem,

Yes, line 1109 can have the evaluable check removed as it contains two sub-controls that complement it, and these two sub-controls are evaluable.

And lines 1039 and 1041 should have the evaluable check. I forgot to put their ref_id.
For line 1039 --> ref_id: mp.sw.2.r1.1
For line 1041 --> ref_id: mp.sw.2.r2.1
data009

Thank you very much for your review.

@eric-intuitem eric-intuitem merged commit 72ccfec into intuitem:main Jan 18, 2025
11 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 18, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants