You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Examples should be valid C++, so fixing the earlier error was useful. I don't see why an example that says void foo(int, int) is better than one that says void foo(int x, int y) though. If they're not named, why are they even there? Just do void foo() ... but then it becomes a less realistic and therefore less useful example.
Those unused parameters don't appear relevant to the example that converts enums to strings to make them useful for the reader. We can close it if you think differently.
There is a warning about the unused x,y params in the example - Can those x,y there be removed?
https://godbolt.org/z/hb41sfnsb
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: