Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Suggest]: Remove Ingress from Jaeger Operator's simplest Profile #2520

Open
kehao95 opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Suggest]: Remove Ingress from Jaeger Operator's simplest Profile #2520

kehao95 opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kehao95
Copy link

kehao95 commented Apr 3, 2024

Requirement

According to the current documentation for getting started with the Jaeger Operator, users are advised to deploy an ingress-controller to access the Jaeger UI. This approach has caused some confusion and operational hurdles for users. Especially for beginners.

#1174
#2515

Problem

  • The approach to exposing Kubernetes services has changed considerably over the years. While Ingress is still relevant, it may not be the preferred choice for the majority.
  • The variance in ingress controller implementations makes it challenging to support and test all of them. And should not be the scope of this project.
  • Exposing services outside of the cluster might not be advisable for all users, especially those just starting with Kubernetes.

Proposal

I propose the following changes to the Jaeger Operator's simplest profile and Getting started guide

  • Remove the Ingress setup from the simplest profile configuration.
  • Introduce kubectl port-forward as the recommended method for accessing the Jaeger UI in the simplest profile.

Open questions

No response

@kehao95 kehao95 added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant