Possibility of adding support for trashy?

[limaceous-bushwhacker]

Alternative to trash-cli; much better than it actually.

https://github.com/oberblastmeister/trashy

[jarun]

We already have support for 2 popular/widely available utilities.
Please modify the code and use it.

[linkert]

Would be nice if NNN_TRASH was not a set number of options. That it would instead take whatever command the user wants the variable to represent. The manpage could then simply suggest two common utilities and leave it to the user to decide. Future mega-trends of trash management avoided, win.

I could imagine multiple ways a user would want to handle trash besides simply what utility to utilize.

Hack up or put up I guess but that makes any user input rather pointless don't you think? ;)

[limaceous-bushwhacker]

Seconded, that's a good idea!

[jarun]

That it would instead take whatever command the user wants the variable to represent.

Unfortunately the utilities are not always option-compatible.

[limaceous-bushwhacker]

@jarun Any pointers on how to modify the source code to use a different utitlity? Another trash manager has popped up: https://github.com/umlx5h/gtrash

[jarun]

Sure! Search for the string "trash" in the code.

[N-R-K]

@limaceous-bushwhacker master branch now supports custom command in $NNN_TRASH. You don't need to patch the source or use some wrapper anymore. See the wiki and manpage for more info.