Update tests

jaykorean · Mar 12, 2024 · af948c5 · af948c5
1 parent bdbead0
commit af948c5
Showing 1 changed file with 4 additions and 4 deletions.
diff --git a/db/multi_cf_iterator_test.cc b/db/multi_cf_iterator_test.cc
@@ -234,21 +234,21 @@ TEST_F(MultiCfIteratorTest, EmptyCfs) {
     ASSERT_OK(iter->status());
   }
   {
-    // Case 2: keys in only one of the CF. Rest CFs are empty.
+    // Case 2: A single key exists in only one of the CF. Rest CFs are empty.
     ASSERT_OK(Put(1, "key_1", "key_1_cf_1_val"));
     std::unique_ptr<Iterator> iter =
         db_->NewMultiCfIterator(ReadOptions(), handles_);
     iter->SeekToFirst();
     ASSERT_EQ(IterStatus(iter.get()), "key_1->key_1_cf_1_val");
     iter->Next();
     ASSERT_EQ(IterStatus(iter.get()), "(invalid)");
-    iter->SeekToFirst();
+    iter->SeekToLast();
     ASSERT_EQ(IterStatus(iter.get()), "key_1->key_1_cf_1_val");
     iter->Prev();
     ASSERT_EQ(IterStatus(iter.get()), "(invalid)");
   }
   {
-    // Case 3: same keys in all of the CFs except one (cf_2).
+    // Case 3: same key exists in all of the CFs except one (cf_2)
     ASSERT_OK(Put(0, "key_1", "key_1_cf_0_val"));
     ASSERT_OK(Put(3, "key_1", "key_1_cf_3_val"));
     // handles_ are in the order of 0->1->2->3. We should expect value from cf_0
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ TEST_F(MultiCfIteratorTest, EmptyCfs) {
     ASSERT_EQ(IterStatus(iter.get()), "key_1->key_1_cf_0_val");
     iter->Next();
     ASSERT_EQ(IterStatus(iter.get()), "(invalid)");
-    iter->SeekToFirst();
+    iter->SeekToLast();
     ASSERT_EQ(IterStatus(iter.get()), "key_1->key_1_cf_0_val");
     iter->Prev();
     ASSERT_EQ(IterStatus(iter.get()), "(invalid)");