Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test for FolderBasedJobInclusionStrategy class #422

Merged

Conversation

yashpal2104
Copy link
Contributor

Testing done

Add test for FolderBasedJobInclusionStrategy class

Fixes JENKINS-69757

Submitter checklist

  • Make sure you are opening from a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side) and not your main branch!
  • Ensure that the pull request title represents the desired changelog entry
  • Please describe what you did
  • Link to relevant issues in GitHub or Jira

@yashpal2104 yashpal2104 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 28, 2024 11:43
@github-actions github-actions bot added the tests Automated test addition or improvement label Dec 28, 2024
yashpal2104 and others added 5 commits December 28, 2024 18:02
…egy' into folder-based-job-inclusion-strategy
Use ClassRule to only initialize the JenkinsRule once for all tests in
the class.  Makes the tests faster on Linux and much faster on Windows.

Remove unused variable declarations

Split the BeforeClass tasks to separate methods for clarity.
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite enabled auto-merge (squash) December 28, 2024 17:11
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite merged commit 1945a6d into jenkinsci:master Dec 28, 2024
17 of 18 checks passed
@yashpal2104 yashpal2104 deleted the folder-based-job-inclusion-strategy branch December 28, 2024 17:28
@yashpal2104 yashpal2104 restored the folder-based-job-inclusion-strategy branch December 28, 2024 18:57
@yashpal2104 yashpal2104 deleted the folder-based-job-inclusion-strategy branch December 28, 2024 18:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
tests Automated test addition or improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants