-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MathML <mo> created for each adjacent Rel symbol #220
Comments
Actually, spacing attributes are probably more correct than collapsing the symbols into one element. E.g. <mo rspace=0>:</mo>
<mo rspace=0>:</mo>
<mo>:</mo> |
I'm curious, why is the latter better? |
An |
Can you give page reference to the relevant part of the TeX book? |
The table at chapter 18, page 170 gives the amount of inter-element spacing. Following the rules in appendix G, adjacent Rel aren't otherwise transformed so the (lack of) spacing applies directly. |
According to the TeXBook, adjacent Rel symbols shouldn't have space between them. In the MathML output, multiple
<mo>
are created for each symbol which doesn't seem correct. Example of current behaviour:Input:
:::
MathML output:
I would expect only one element to be output. This is what MathJax does, for example.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: