diff --git a/content/hobbies/reading/reviews/2024.md b/content/hobbies/reading/reviews/2024.md
index f3bd860..ff8a2d3 100644
--- a/content/hobbies/reading/reviews/2024.md
+++ b/content/hobbies/reading/reviews/2024.md
@@ -353,3 +353,16 @@ This diverse range of viewpoints that McPhee was able to find is rather impressi
 The writing is, of course, in the classic John McPhee style: compelling and complex, but never feeling long-winded or unnecessarily verbose.
 Each paragraph introduces a new facet of the story or a fresh perspective, giving as much or as little space as needed to faithfully present the idea.
 I would recommend this to anyone who enjoys non-fiction essays or wants to understand any of the three topics they cover.
+
+<a style="float: left; padding-right: 15px"><img border="0" src="https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1426559863l/23515727._SX98_.jpg"/></a>
+
+## *No Country for Old Men*
+
+**Cormac McCarthy** <br>
+Rating: NA / 5
+
+This is my first Cormac McCarthy novel.
+I knew he was a beloved American author, but didn't know that his books are highly symbolic and cerebral.
+I underestimated the intensity with which I would need to study the text, and so I completely missed the point.
+I finished the novel with a feeling of knowing I failed to understand something far deeper.
+Maybe someday I'll reread this American classic, but for now I feel it is inappropriate to leave a rating.