You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently when a single structure model is passed to composite modelling, a "shortcut" is taken to simplify the resulting reported parameters. This complicates scripted analysis comparing the results between single structure and multistructure fitting results. Such comparisons are potentially common when fitting a tree structure such that the root results are different in naming convention when compared to the rest of the tree's models. This "shortcut" should likely be removed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently when a single structure model is passed to composite modelling, a "shortcut" is taken to simplify the resulting reported parameters. This complicates scripted analysis comparing the results between single structure and multistructure fitting results. Such comparisons are potentially common when fitting a tree structure such that the root results are different in naming convention when compared to the rest of the tree's models. This "shortcut" should likely be removed.
Can you point out in the code where this "shortcut" take place?
Currently when a single structure model is passed to composite modelling, a "shortcut" is taken to simplify the resulting reported parameters. This complicates scripted analysis comparing the results between single structure and multistructure fitting results. Such comparisons are potentially common when fitting a tree structure such that the root results are different in naming convention when compared to the rest of the tree's models. This "shortcut" should likely be removed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: