Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request: Allow overlay in a single channel #111

Open
RubyTheDog190 opened this issue Sep 29, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Request: Allow overlay in a single channel #111

RubyTheDog190 opened this issue Sep 29, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@RubyTheDog190
Copy link

If you want to have different note lengths at the spot, you can't really do that unless if you add a arpeggio effect for chords or you have to completely make a new channel. I am suggesting to add the ability to do that easily by just putting the notes down like normal.

@M0ahgra
Copy link

M0ahgra commented Sep 29, 2024

what is 'overlay'?

@RubyTheDog190
Copy link
Author

I don't think I specified well with the terms I used, but what I'm trying to say is in the screenshot below,
image
I want the notes on the left to "merge" as a continuous one, but I also want the notes below to be separate. I know this issue can be solved by having other channels to do this, but I feel that the implementation of allowing the ability to add notes of different lengths in the same place will be less tedious and annoying to do.

@Mid-The-Modder
Copy link

Well actually, having overlapping notes of varying sizes and etc. would actually be kinda difficult to deal with, it requires a complete rework of how notes work iirc and certain effects may need to be removed or changed in logic. Speaking of effects, if you don't want to use separate channels for this, you can use the transition type effect set to "continue" for something similar to the behavior you are looking for. Then you can tinker with note size and volume to tweak the note transitioning to be how you want it to be.

@RubyTheDog190
Copy link
Author

Yeah, having this feature would be really hard to remake so I understand if it is not implemented in

@EliTheFox17
Copy link

EliTheFox17 commented Oct 17, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants