Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Android wrapping. #46

Open
samburgers opened this issue Mar 29, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Android wrapping. #46

samburgers opened this issue Mar 29, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@samburgers
Copy link

Just wondering if this is designed (or roadmapped) to fix the wrapping bug in Android browser 4 -> 4.3, and UC Browser 9.9 for Android?

I have attempted to use flexibility to polyfill those browsers, but to no success.

Many thanks

http://caniuse.com/#feat=flexbox
"Only supports the old flexbox specification and does not support wrapping."

@jonathantneal
Copy link
Owner

TL;DR; yes it is roadmapped for the next major release.

The next version would allow you to add flexibility to browsers outside of IE. Right now, I am leveraging a proprietary style in IE called currentStyle, which is why this script only works for IE. However, this script could be extended in a manner that allows you to use it for Android. In this case, you would end up needing something like an additional build process that tells JavaScript which elements are flex, or alternatively, you would need to rely on something like data attributes to tell the script which elements are flex. In short, unless I know which elements are flex (like I do using the aforementioned IE proprietary hack), then I need to be told explicitly.

@samburgers
Copy link
Author

great to hear, and thanks for the reply.

@samburgers
Copy link
Author

Just wondering if this ever make it into 2.x? still appears to be an issue on Android 4.2 - 4.4 and possibly others.

@afilp
Copy link

afilp commented Nov 11, 2016

I wonder the same too, is this fixed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants