Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Support for Component Priority Class Configuration in Karmada Operator #6042

Open
8 tasks
RainbowMango opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
8 tasks
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Milestone

Comments

@RainbowMango
Copy link
Member

Background
Currently, the priority class name for Karmada components is hardcoded to system-node-critical for some components, while others do not specify a priority class at all. This limitation can compromise the reliability and stability of the system in environments where scheduling of critical components is essential.

Proposal

Author:

Iteration Tasks

  • Feature implementation (@jabellard)
  • Unify the PriorityClass configuration(defaults to system-node-critical) in helm chart
  • Unify the PriorityClass configuration(defaults to system-node-critical) in karmadactl init
  • Unify the PriorityClass configuration(defaults to system-node-critical) in karmadactl addon
  • Unify the PriorityClass configuration(defaults to system-node-critical) in hack/local-up-karmada.sh
  • Feature documentation
  • TBD(How to cover this feature in CI test suite?)
@RainbowMango RainbowMango added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Jan 14, 2025
@RainbowMango RainbowMango moved this to Planned In Release 1.13 in Karmada Overall Backlog Jan 14, 2025
@RainbowMango RainbowMango added this to the v1.13 milestone Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Projects
Status: Planned In Release 1.13
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant