The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: vanny96 / name: Giovanni Barbaro (6b9522f, fe8e798, b81608d)

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vanny96
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign tao12345666333 for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If Ingress contributors determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Welcome @vanny96!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/ingress-nginx 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/ingress-nginx has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

Hi @vanny96. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-ingress-nginx canceled.

Ciao @vanny96!

Thank you very much for your contributions! Some first notes:

Could you please not commit the go.work.sum as long as you haven't changed anything on the go.work or go.mod file?

Do you think there would be a way to only set this option if it differs from the global default? If I understand your change correctly, you're trying to achieve that one can disable logging globally and only enable it for specific locations, right?

If so, this totally makes sense to me. But I think we can achieve this without changing the type of the configuration option, which would be a breaking change.

Mille grazie
Marco

/hold

Please do not proceed with any nginx.tmpl change until we can finish the crossplane migration.

Thanks!

Hey @Gacko,

First of all, I'm sorry for the go.sum, Goland likes to shuffle things around and I didn't pay enough attention! I'll fix it now!

My intention was exactly what you mentioned! Being able to disable access_log globally and re-enable it locally would be the idea! I tried to think of all the edge cases and couldn't come up with a way to support it without changing it (while still keeping back compatibility)

End goal:

• enable-access-log: true -> always sets access_log on;
• enable-access-log: false -> always sets access_log off;
• enable-access-log is unset -> follows the previous behaviour

Things I tried:

• Writing logic with only "true" and "false": This unfortunately didn't give us enough info as from the template we cannot identify if a variable is true/false or unset.
• Turning the configuration from a bool to a *bool: This is honestly the one that would make most sense, but I struggled quite a bit to handle the nil scenario in the template as it would constantly throw dereference errors

Maybe I can spend some more time on this second approach, but otherwise do you have any other possible ideas to explore?

Hey @Gacko, did you have a chance to take a look at this?