You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
ForBES gives messgae-"reached optimum" with adaptive nama and panoc on maros-meszaros- but problem not solved- for example choose two sets DTOC3 & DUALC2 with p_test_maros_meszaros.m
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 10:35, Manish ***@***.***> wrote:
ForBES gives messgae-"reached optimum" with adaptive nama and panoc on
maros-meszaros- but problem not solved- for example choose two sets DTOC3 &
DUALC2 with p_test_maros_meszaros.m
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#6>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAafK51p6w9-4GH4acsWpoYpqt4lInKEks5vEZVrgaJpZM4aHi1M>
.
Yes, they are made strongly convex using regularization to Hessian. Could this message be maintained if the problem is not actually solved in ForBES? Actually the same type of data-sets fails line-search in a very naive implementation of NAMA.
ForBES gives messgae-"reached optimum" with adaptive nama and panoc on maros-meszaros- but problem not solved- for example choose two sets DTOC3 & DUALC2 with p_test_maros_meszaros.m
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: