Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEAT] drop NET_ADMIN capabilities or add reasoning to documentation #20

Open
1 task done
mhymny opened this issue Dec 23, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
1 task done
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mhymny
Copy link

mhymny commented Dec 23, 2024

Is this a new feature request?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Wanted change

I want to either remove the NET_ADMIN capability or document why it is needed.

Reason for change

I am able to run the docker image using podman without the NET_ADMIN capability, so I don't see a reason for the container to have those capabilities. I have been only using sunshine and moonlight, so this might be a steam remote play issue which I cant test right now. In any case however this seems to be the only undocumented parameter.

Proposed code change

No response

@mhymny mhymny added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 23, 2024
Copy link

Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the relevant issue templates, or risk having this issue marked as invalid.

@LinuxServer-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. This might be due to missing feedback from OP. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@thelamer
Copy link
Member

NET_ADMIN is needed for steam remote play specifically spoofing the IP if setting the host, I found that was needed when using a Linux host and a Windows client.

As far as requirements the only hard requirements are apparmor and seccomp unconfined as steam will not run without it, the rest is optional.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Issues
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants