This directory contains the Coq mechanization accompanying the submission "Le Temps des Cerises: Efficient Temporal Stack Safety on Capability Machines using Directed Capabilities".
You need to have opam >= 2.0 installed.
The development is known to compile with Coq 8.12.0 and Iris 3.3.0. To install those, two options:
- Option 1: create a fresh local opam switch with everything needed:
opam switch create -y --deps-only --repositories=default,coq-released=https://coq.inria.fr/opam/released .
eval $(opam env)
- Option 2 (manual installation): if you already have an opam switch with ocaml >= 4.10.0:
# Add the coq-released repo (skip if you already have it)
opam repo add coq-released https://coq.inria.fr/opam/released
# Install Coq 8.12.0 (skip if already installed)
opam install coq.8.12.0
opam update
opam install coq-iris.3.3.0
For Option 1, if the invocation fails at some point, either remove the _opam
directory and re-run the command (this will redo everything), or do eval $(opam env)
and then opam install -y --deps-only .
(this will continue from where it
failed).
make -jN # replace N with the number of CPU cores of your machine
We recommend that you have 32Gb of RAM+swap. Please be aware that the
development takes around 2 to 3 hours to compile. In particular, the files
theories/examples/awkward_example_u.v
and theories/examples/stack_object.v
can each take up to 30 minutes to compile.
It is possible to run make fundamental
to only build files up to the
Fundamental Theorem (and make fundamental-binary
to build up until the binary
FTLR, or make full-abstraction
to build up until the full abstraction
theorem). Each usually takes up 20 minutes.
The command make check-admitted
will grep for 'admit\|Admitted\|ADMITTED'
in
the Coq files.
After building the development, documentation generated using Coqdoc can be
created using make html
.
Then, browse the html/toc.html
file.
Note that we have included a copy of the generated html files as a supplemental material.
First is a lookup table for the definitions in the paper.
paper | file or folder | name |
---|---|---|
Machine words, machine state and instructions (Fig 2) | machine_base.v | |
Permission hierarchy (Fig 4) | machine_base.v | PermFlowsTo |
Operational semantics: instruction semantics (Fig 5) | cap_lang.v | exec |
Standard State Transition System (Fig 6) | region_invariants.v | region_type /std_rel_{pub}{priv}{pub_plus} |
Logical relation (Fig 7) | logrel.v | interp /interp_expression /interp_registers |
Theorem 4.1 (FTLR) | fundamental.v | fundamental_from_interp |
Assembly of Listing 7 (Fig 8) | downwards_lse{_preamble}.v | lse_instrs /downwards_lse_preamble_instrs |
Theorem 4.2 | downwards_lse_adequacy.v | downwards_lse_adequacy |
Assembly of Listing 9 (Fig 9) | stack_object{_preamble}.v | stack_object_passing_instrs /stack_object_preamble_instrs |
Theorem 4.3 | stack_object_adequacy.v | obj_adequacy |
Theorem 6.1 | full_abstraction.v | compile_fully_abstract |
Definition 6.2 (forward simulation) | simulation.v | forward_simulation |
Lemma 6.3 | simulation.v | fsim_terminates |
Next we describe the file organization of the implementation.
The organization of the theories/
folder is as follows.
-
addr_reg.v
: Defines registers and the set of (finite) memory addresses. -
machine_base.v
: Contains the syntax (permissions, capability, instructions, ...) of the capability machine. -
machine_parameters.v
: Defines a number of "settings" for the machine, that parameterize the whole development (e.g. the specific encoding scheme for instructions, etc.). -
cap_lang.v
: Defines the operational semantics of the machine, and the embedding of the capability machine language into Iris.
-
region.v
: Auxiliary definitions to reason about consecutive range of addresses and memory words. -
rules/rules_base.v
: Contains some of the core resource algebras for the program logic, namely the definition for points to predicates with permissions. -
rules/rules.v
: Imports all the Hoare triple rules for each instruction. These rules are separated into separate files (located in therules/
folder).
-
multiple_updates.v
: Auxiliary definitions to reason about multiple updates to a world. -
region_invariants_transitions.v
: Lemmas about standard transitions -
region_invariants.v
: Definitions for standard resources, and the shared resources map sharedResources. Contains some lemmas for "opening" and "closing" the map, akin to opening and closing invariants. -
region_invariants_revocation.v
: Lemmas for revoking standard resources (setting Temporary invariants to a Revoked state). -
region_invariants_static.v
: Lemmas for manipulating frozen standard resources. -
region_invariants_batch_uninitialized.v
: Lemmas for manipulating uninitialized standard resources. -
region_invariants_allocation.v
: Lemmas for allocating a range of standard resources. -
sts.v
: The definition of stsCollection, and associated lemmas. In particular: priv/pub/temporal future world relations (all these definitions are parametrized by the standard states and three relations over them transitions. These are instantiated inregion_invariants.v
) -
logrel.v
: The definition of the unary logical relation. -
monotone.v
: Proof of the monotonicity of the value relation with regards to public future worlds, and private future worlds for non local words. -
fundamental.v
: Contains Theorem 4.1: fundamental theorem of logical relations. Each case (one for each instruction) is proved in a separate file (located in theftlr/
folder), which are all imported and applied in this file.
The correspondance between the lemmas and the Coq statements is as follows.
paper | file or folder | name |
---|---|---|
Lemma A.1 (address relative monotonicity) | monotone.v | interp_monotone_a |
Lemma A.2 (address relative weakening) | sts.v | related_sts_a_weak_world |
Lemma A.3 (private monotonicity) | monotone.v | interp_monotone_nm |
Theorem 4.1 (FTLR) | fundamental.v | fundamental_from_interp |
The binary model is fully contained in the binary_model
folder.
The binary model uses the same program logic as in the unary model, and a similar
family of rules for the specification part of the refinement.
These rules are all in the binary_model/rules_binary
folder. In particular,
the binary_model/rules_binary/rules_binary_base.v
file contains the resource
algebra used for the specification part of the refinement.
-
region_invariants{_XX}_binary.v
: Binary version of the sharedResources. -
logrel_binary.v
: Binary logical relation (Fig. 11). -
fundamental_binary.v
: Binary fundamental theorem of logical relations (Theorem C.1). Each case is proved in a separate file located inbinary_model/ftlr_binary/
.
In the examples
folder:
-
macros/*
: Specifications for some useful macros -
macros/scall_u.v
: Specification of a safe calling convention for a URWLX Directed stack. The specification is split up into two parts: the prologue is the specification for the code before the jump, the epilogue is the specification for the activation record. -
macros/malloc.v
: A simple malloc implementation, its specification, and a proof that it is valid. -
downwards_lse{_preamble}{_adequacy}.v
: The assembly definition and proof of Listing 7. Thepreamble
file creates the closure, and theadequacy
file applies the adequacy of Iris weakest preconditions to prove the final theorem, Theorem 4.2. -
stack_object{_preamble}{_adequacy}.v
: The assembly definition and proof of Listing 9. Thepreamble
file creates the closure, and theadequacy
file applies the adequacy of Iris weakest preconditions to prove the final theorem, Theorem 4.3. -
awkward_example{_u}{_preamble}{_adequacy}.v
: The assembly definition and proof of Listing 5. Thepreamble
file creates the closure, and theadequacy
file applies the adequacy of Iris weakest preconditions to prove the final theorem.
In the binary_model/examples_binary
folder:
-
macros_binary
: Exports all macro specifications for the "spec" side of the binary logical relation -
confidentiality{_adequacy}{_adequacy_theorem}.v
: The assembly definition and proof of contextual equivalence of Listing 8. The adequacy files contain the contextual equivalence statements and proofs. They apply the linking definitions fromlinking.v
(see below).
linking.v
: Defines the general theory of components, well-formed components, linking and contexts as presented in Appendix B.
In the overlay
folder:
-
lang.v
: Defines the overlay semantics. Note that we use a more restrictive definition of safe words as explained in Appendix D due to some Coq engineering issues. -
call.v
: Defines the implementation on the base machine of the call instruction.
-
simulation.v
: Defines the general theory of forward simulations and prove additional corollaries. -
overlay_cap_lang_sim.v
: Proves the forward simulation between the overlay semantics and the base capability machine. In particular,sim
is the simulation relation, andoverlay_to_cap_lang_fsim
is the proof of the forward simulation. -
full_abstraction.v
: Defines fully abstract compilation, and Theoremcompile_fully_abstract
proves the full abstraction result of Theorem 6.1 in the paper.
Some definitions have different names from the paper.
name in paper => name in mechanization
In the operational semantics:
name in paper | name in mechanization |
---|---|
Executable | Instr Executable |
Halted | Instr Halted |
Failed | Instr Failed |
For technical reasons (so that Iris considers a single instruction as an atomic step), the execution mode is interweaved with the "Instr Next" mode, which reduces to a value. The Seq _ context can then return and continue to the next instruction. The full expression for an executing program is Seq (Instr Executable).
In the model:
name in paper | name in mechanization |
---|---|
Frozen | Monostatic |
stsCollection | full_sts_world |
sharedResources | region |
Temporary | Monotemporary |
temporal transition | std_rel_pub_plus |
In scall_u.v
: the scall macro is slightly unfolded, as it does not include the part of
the calling convention which stores local state on the stack. That part is inlined into the
examples.