From 9c9b853e20e6cec3e64f618aa173bf37a58765e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marty Downs <36973139+marty-downs@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:44:11 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] I give up, making it full width module1.qmd --- module1.qmd | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/module1.qmd b/module1.qmd index 2cde143..95daee5 100644 --- a/module1.qmd +++ b/module1.qmd @@ -173,20 +173,14 @@ In our experience at NCEAS and the LTER Network Office, we've found teams of up - Synchronous and asynchronous contributions - Practice “cultural norming” by educating participants on systemic/structural oppression and racism and ways to work against our own implicit biases -::: {#fig-benefits} - - - -Survey results from 5 cohorts of LTER-funded synthesis groups to the question: *How important is it to you to gain the following potential benefits through participation in the working group? - -::: - **At intervals** - When you find yourself questioning whether a practice or activity is still valuable, ask each member for a quick read on whether the group should **"Start, Stop, or Continue"** the activity In any team project, people have different reasons for wanting to participate. For you, getting a high profile paper may be the most important thing. For others, it may be expanding their network or a chance to practice new skills. Being transparent about those motivations makes it easier to resolve tensions when they arise. +![Survey results from 5 cohorts of LTER-funded synthesis groups to the question: *How important is it to you to gain the following potential benefits through participation in the working group?](images/LTER_Survey-2_benefit-importance.png){. lightbox fig-alt="importance of various benefits to working group participants" fig-align="right"} + ::: {.callout-note} ## Time Commitments