You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Produce the bipartite network with tags to emotion clusters (tag<->emotion)
Produce two separate networks, one for the emotion clusters as nodes with memes as edges between them, and then a network for the tags with the description co-location (co-occurrence) edges between them.
Produce a network with both types of nodes (emotion cluster centers and tags) and all 3 types of edges (tag<->tag / emotion<->emotion / tag<->emotion).
Produce a graph where there are the different images as nodes and tags as nodes, where the edges are between images and tags (image<->tag), and then also another graph where the tags also link between themselves (image<->tag / tag<->tag). Do the same with the emotion cluster centers in place of the tag as nodes (image<->emotion) and also (image<->emotion / emotion<->emotion (via memes)). Then all types together (image<->tag / image<->emotion) and finally with all types of edges (image<->tag / image<->emotion / tag<->tag / emotion<->emotion).
What are the use cases of these graphs? (for the user)
What unique behaviors can be uncovered?
If these networks are of any value, should they be available to the user as a tool within Tagasaurus?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Potential research questions:
Produce the bipartite network with tags to emotion clusters (tag<->emotion)
Produce two separate networks, one for the emotion clusters as nodes with memes as edges between them, and then a network for the tags with the description co-location (co-occurrence) edges between them.
Produce a network with both types of nodes (emotion cluster centers and tags) and all 3 types of edges (tag<->tag / emotion<->emotion / tag<->emotion).
Produce a graph where there are the different images as nodes and tags as nodes, where the edges are between images and tags (image<->tag), and then also another graph where the tags also link between themselves (image<->tag / tag<->tag). Do the same with the emotion cluster centers in place of the tag as nodes (image<->emotion) and also (image<->emotion / emotion<->emotion (via memes)). Then all types together (image<->tag / image<->emotion) and finally with all types of edges (image<->tag / image<->emotion / tag<->tag / emotion<->emotion).
What are the use cases of these graphs? (for the user)
What unique behaviors can be uncovered?
If these networks are of any value, should they be available to the user as a tool within Tagasaurus?
Summary of possible network visualizations
(tag<->emotion) (bi-partite)
(tag<->tag / emotion<->emotion)
(tag<->tag / emotion<->emotion / tag<->emotion)
(image<->tag)
(image<->tag / tag<->tag)
(image<->emotion)
(image<->emotion / emotion<->emotion)
(image<->tag / image<->emotion)
(image<->tag / image<->emotion / tag<->tag / emotion<->emotion)
@randyll @MichaelHopwood @phuongpho
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions