You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At time of writing, I've split the functions into three groups on the website reference page: there are loosely divs (i.e. fenced with :::), classes (e.g. slide layout helpers, like {.smaller}) and 'other' (e.g. . . .). These are all things you insert into the body of your document.
I don't think the wording is useful or helpful. What's the easiest, most correct, most user-friendly way of presenting this different 'types of things'?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At time of writing, I've split the functions into three groups on the website reference page: there are loosely divs (i.e. fenced with
:::
), classes (e.g. slide layout helpers, like{.smaller}
) and 'other' (e.g.. . .
). These are all things you insert into the body of your document.I don't think the wording is useful or helpful. What's the easiest, most correct, most user-friendly way of presenting this different 'types of things'?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: