You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi flaml community and maintainers! First of all, fantastic library and incredible algorithms. My team is using flaml.tune to run our custom hyperparameter tuning workflows. It's economical, easy-to-use, fast, and powerful: all 💯 features for production.
There is is one problem causing us headaches though: our Docker images with flaml installed are too big. The culprit? xgboost and lightgbm: we aren't using these models in our ML workflow. Having to install these two dependencies just to use flaml.tune is really slowing down our development cycles. Moreover, we are paying for those extra unused MiBs to ECR.
Please correct me if I'm mistaken, but I don't think lightgbm and xgboost are necessary for flaml.tune?
P.S.
Perhaps pandas can also be made into an optional dependency? I know many serious data teams that have pure numpy ML workflows in production: pandas is just unnecessary bloat. Once again, I don't think pandas is required for flaml.tune?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi
flamlcommunity and maintainers! First of all, fantastic library and incredible algorithms. My team is usingflaml.tuneto run our custom hyperparameter tuning workflows. It's economical, easy-to-use, fast, and powerful: all 💯 features for production.There is is one problem causing us headaches though: our Docker images with
flamlinstalled are too big. The culprit?xgboostandlightgbm: we aren't using these models in our ML workflow. Having to install these two dependencies just to useflaml.tuneis really slowing down our development cycles. Moreover, we are paying for those extra unused MiBs to ECR.Please correct me if I'm mistaken, but I don't think
lightgbmandxgboostare necessary forflaml.tune?P.S.
Perhaps
pandascan also be made into an optional dependency? I know many serious data teams that have pure numpy ML workflows in production:pandasis just unnecessary bloat. Once again, I don't thinkpandasis required forflaml.tune?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions