Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-introduce: Update syft image and doc - use docker commands #1319

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2025

Conversation

pauld-msft
Copy link
Member

Reverts #1318 , which re-introduces the Syft update

@pauld-msft pauld-msft requested a review from a team as a code owner December 4, 2024 16:28
@pauld-msft pauld-msft requested a review from chsalgado December 4, 2024 16:28
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 3.44828% with 140 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.3%. Comparing base (e7239ea) to head (1eb1211).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...tDetection.Detectors/linux/Contracts/SyftOutput.cs 2.7% 140 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #1319     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   89.7%   89.3%   -0.4%     
=======================================
  Files        387     387             
  Lines      30271   30387    +116     
  Branches    1871    1871             
=======================================
+ Hits       27158   27162      +4     
- Misses      2713    2827    +114     
+ Partials     400     398      -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pauld-msft pauld-msft merged commit a3a2c6e into main Jan 27, 2025
22 of 26 checks passed
@pauld-msft pauld-msft deleted the revert-1318-revert-1307-pauldorsch/updatesyftdocs branch January 27, 2025 16:47
Copy link

👋 Hi! It looks like you modified some files in the Detectors folder.
You may need to bump the detector versions if any of the following scenarios apply:

  • The detector detects more or fewer components than before
  • The detector generates different parent/child graph relationships than before
  • The detector generates different devDependencies values than before

If none of the above scenarios apply, feel free to ignore this comment 🙂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants