diff --git a/examples/cacoh.py b/examples/cacoh.py
index 649e73c2..22a255a7 100644
--- a/examples/cacoh.py
+++ b/examples/cacoh.py
@@ -42,10 +42,13 @@
 # that are present between only a small number of channels.
 #
 # Canonical coherency (CaCoh) is a multivariate form of coherency that uses
-# spatial filters to extract the relevant components of connectivity in a
-# frequency-resolved manner :footcite:`VidaurreEtAl2019`. It is similar to
-# multivariate methods based on the imaginary part of coherency (MIC & MIM
-# :footcite:`EwaldEtAl2012`; see :doc:`mic_mim` and
+# eigendecomposition-derived spatial filters to extract the underlying
+# components of connectivity in a frequency-resolved manner
+# :footcite:`VidaurreEtAl2019`. This approach goes beyond simply aggregating
+# information across all possible combinations of signals.
+#
+# It is similar to multivariate methods based on the imaginary part of
+# coherency (MIC & MIM :footcite:`EwaldEtAl2012`; see :doc:`mic_mim` and
 # :doc:`compare_coherency_methods`).
 
 
diff --git a/examples/compare_coherency_methods.py b/examples/compare_coherency_methods.py
index 9c8e09fe..a823e8d4 100644
--- a/examples/compare_coherency_methods.py
+++ b/examples/compare_coherency_methods.py
@@ -47,7 +47,8 @@
 # between two signals), advanced multivariate measures (i.e. between groups of
 # signals) have also been developed based on Cohy (CaCoh
 # :footcite:`VidaurreEtAl2019`; can take the absolute value for a multivariate
-# form of Coh) or ImCoh (MIC & MIM :footcite:`EwaldEtAl2012`).
+# form of Coh; see :doc:`cacoh`) or ImCoh (MIC & MIM :footcite:`EwaldEtAl2012`;
+# see :doc:`mic_mim`).
 #
 # Despite their similarities, there are distinct scenarios in which these
 # different methods are most appropriate, as we will show in this example.
diff --git a/examples/mic_mim.py b/examples/mic_mim.py
index 511cc2a8..67c6e6d3 100644
--- a/examples/mic_mim.py
+++ b/examples/mic_mim.py
@@ -42,19 +42,32 @@
 # A popular bivariate measure of connectivity is the imaginary part of
 # coherency, which looks at the correlation between two signals in the
 # frequency domain and is immune to spurious connectivity arising from volume
-# conduction artefacts :footcite:`NolteEtAl2004`. However, depending on the
-# degree of source mixing, this measure is susceptible to biased estimates of
+# conduction artefacts :footcite:`NolteEtAl2004`. However, in cases where
+# interactions between multiple signals are of interest, computing connectivity
+# between all possible combinations of signals leads to a very large number of
+# results which is difficult to interpret. A common approach is to average
+# results across these connections, however this risks reducing the
+# signal-to-noise ratio of results and burying interactions that are present
+# between only a small number of channels.
+#
+# Additionally, this bivariate measure is susceptible to biased estimates of
 # connectivity based on the spatial proximity of sensors
-# :footcite:`EwaldEtAl2012`.
+# :footcite:`EwaldEtAl2012` depending on the degree of source mixing in the
+# signals.
+#
+# To overcome this limitation, spatial filters derived from eigendecompositions
+# allows connectivity to be analysed in a multivariate manner, removing the
+# source mixing-dependent bias and increase the signal-to-noise ratio of
+# connectivity estimates :footcite:`EwaldEtAl2012`. This approach goes beyond
+# simply aggregating information across all possible combinations of signals,
+# extracting the underlying components of connectivity in a frequency-resolved
+# manner.
 #
-# To overcome this limitation, spatial filters can be used to estimate
-# connectivity free from this source mixing-dependent bias, which additionally
-# increases the signal-to-noise ratio and allows signals to be analysed in a
-# multivariate manner :footcite:`EwaldEtAl2012`. This approach leads to the
-# following methods: the maximised imaginary part of coherency (MIC); and the
-# multivariate interaction measure (MIM). These methods are similar to the
-# multivariate method based on coherency (CaCoh :footcite:`VidaurreEtAl2019`;
-# see :doc:`cacoh` and :doc:`compare_coherency_methods`).
+# This leads to the following methods: the maximised imaginary part of
+# coherency (MIC); and the multivariate interaction measure (MIM). These
+# methods are similar to the multivariate method based on coherency (CaCoh
+# :footcite:`VidaurreEtAl2019`; see :doc:`cacoh` and
+# :doc:`compare_coherency_methods`).
 #
 # We start by loading some example MEG data and dividing it into
 # two-second-long epochs.