Table with tomograms

[tischi]

@constantinpape
If you think the label mask is too much of a hack, we can also think of another solution.
But maybe it actually turns out to even be a good general solution even for the PlateViewer...
I can't wrap my head around it right now. Maybe we just try and see what happens?

[constantinpape]

If you think the label mask is too much of a hack, we can also think of another solution.
But maybe it actually turns out to even be a good general solution even for the PlateViewer...
I can't wrap my head around it right now. Maybe we just try and see what happens?

I agree, let's just try it and see how we can improve it in the long run.
I think for whatever we come up with we can reuse the table in any case, because we will somehow need the bounding box and anchor information etc.

[constantinpape]

I have added the mock segmentation with tables for 3 of the datasets.
(There is some issue with the remaining one, but this should be easy to figure out with Yannick).

[tischi]

@constantinpape

I think the name of the uiGroup and "segmentation" is not very intuitive:

“position: em-tomogram-segmentation” as this is just the annotation of the images.

BTW: Could it be that the "new spec" branch still needs to be merged into main?

[constantinpape]

I think the name of the uiGroup and "segmentation" is not very intuitive:

Sure, that's easy to fix; I can do that later.

[constantinpape]

BTW: Could it be that the "new spec" branch still needs to be merged into main?

I am not sure about the differences between the two branches, will check it out later.

[tischi]

If you can, could you do it before lunch? I would like to demo this in a COMULIS meeting today...

[constantinpape]

Sorry, I am still traveling to Heidelberg and the Bahn is misbehaving...
So I don't have so stable internet and can probably not do this now.

[tischi]

I think before 15:00 would still be fine.
Otherwise I can live with the current version.

[constantinpape]

I had a quick look but the differences between the main branch and new-spec are a bit complicated and I am not quite sure which one is more up-to-date. I need to double check this while I can open the project in MoBIE, which is not possible with train WiFi...
Let's stick with the current version and I will have a look at this once I work on the corresponding figure for the paper.

[tischi]

OK!
spec-v2 seems more up to date for me.
I think master is still using a hack for the annotated image view.