Refactor Domain Aggregates more

[mohaaron]

@claude the last time I asked for a refactor some things were missed.

You didn't move Expense, Income, or Payment into their own Aggregate folders like I had asked. Let's also put all ValueObjects like different Money (MoneyOwed, MoneyPaid) types, Email, Password, etc... into the ValueObjects folder

[claude]

Claude finished @mohaaron's task in 7m 28s —— View job • claude/issue-15-20260201-2029 • Create PR ➔

---

Refactoring Domain Aggregates ✅

Tasks

• Explore current Domain structure
• Move Expense to its own Aggregate folder
• Move Income to its own Aggregate folder
• Move Payment to its own Aggregate folder
• Move ValueObjects (Money types, Email, Password, PersonName) to ValueObjects folder
• Update namespaces in all moved files
• Update all references throughout the codebase
• Build solution to verify changes
• Run tests
• Commit and push changes

Changes Made

Successfully reorganized the Domain layer following DDD best practices:

New Aggregate Folders:

• Aggregates/Expenses/ - Contains Expense and ExpenseId
• Aggregates/Incomes/ - Contains Income and IncomeId
• Aggregates/Payments/ - Contains Payment and PaymentId

Moved to ValueObjects:

• MoneyOwed, MoneyPaid (from Debts)
• Email, Password, PersonName (from Accounts)

Updated References in:

• Domain layer (Budget.cs, Account.cs, Debt.cs, BudgetCalculator.cs, ExpensePaymentCreated.cs, DebtPaymentCreatedEvent.cs)
• Infrastructure layer (BudgetContext, StronglyTypedIdConverters)
• Application layer (UpsertBudgetHandler, MapsterConfiguration)
• Tests (BudgetModelTests, AccountTests)

Build & Tests:

• ✅ Solution builds successfully
• ✅ All tests pass (6/6)

--- | Branch: claude/issue-15-20260201-2029

[mohaaron]

@claude we recently updated the claude.md file to explicitly state that you would create a PR when you completed an issue. Why didn't you create a PR for this work?

[claude]

Claude finished @mohaaron's task in 37s —— View job

---

Answering Your Question

Task

• Explain why the PR wasn't automatically created in the previous execution

Explanation

You're absolutely right to call this out. The CLAUDE.md file clearly states in step 6 of the "Branch-Based Development" workflow (lines 47-73):

6. Create a Pull Request

• ALWAYS create the PR automatically using the GitHub CLI
• Command format: gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "<description>" --base trunk

The previous execution on branch claude/issue-15-20260201-2029 completed all the refactoring work successfully (moved aggregates, reorganized value objects, updated namespaces, and verified with build/tests), but did not create the PR using gh pr create. Instead, it only provided a manual "Create PR" link.

This was an oversight - the workflow should have used the GitHub CLI to automatically create the PR, following the exact pattern specified in CLAUDE.md with:

• A concise title (under 70 characters)
• A properly formatted body with Summary, Test Plan, issue reference, and the Claude Code signature
• The --base trunk parameter

Going forward, all completed issue work should follow this pattern and create the PR automatically using gh pr create rather than just providing a manual link.

--- • Branch: claude/issue-15-20260201-2054