Replies: 28 comments
-
|
it would actually be easy to do but i'll need more people to confirm its usefulness. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
why not just use Shortcuts, to enable / disable the alarm ? This is what i do, and it does not require confirmation of master user.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ok I don't think that's a problem. It is a widely used device. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Good Morning. It was just a simple usage example. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
ah ok... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Estaría genial que implementaseis esta opción a parte de utilizarlo para el sistema de seguridad se podría utilizar en multitud de situaciones. Estaremos atentos! Translated:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Would be a nice enhancement +1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
+1 I think that this will be useful. Not only in the case that @Jaguaza mentions, but other ways. Many systems have it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
+1. It is a great idea and very useful |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Good morning, the updates you are putting in the firm for the shellys are very good, it would be interesting the option of having a dummy switch also when possible. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
+1. I join the partner's proposal, I find it interesting to have that dummy switch |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This would be perfect por HomeKit users that look for easy options as possible. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
+1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi guys I think it's a great idea the dummy option !!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
+1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
wow, wow, ok, i get it :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
so, the plan is to add more "sw" sections. currently we only have one for each physical switch but we can have more. set gpio for them to -1 and modify code to ignore all the gpio activity but behave the same in all other respects (state changes, notifications). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
thanks |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I’m very interested!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think the optimal solution would be to integrate this to issue #9 !!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
+1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I guess this should be another easy one, now that code rewrite is done. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
indeed. but only after the roller shutter is done! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
as stateless switch is now coded, this should be fairly easy to add ? could it be added for 2.7.0 ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
not for 2.7.0, but it is much easier after recent refactoring effort. maybe soon. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Proposal:
Create an option in the web interface to create dummy switch.
Objective:
Apart from having the shelly device, having a fake device to be able to add it to automations.
Example:
Automations by a geolocation trigger for connection and disconnection of the alarm in homekit ask for authorization to carry it out in a push notification.
If you create a rule that says when I leave home, turn off and turn on the dumy switch.
And a second rule that says when the switch turns on it turns on the alarm.
Since the switch is not a homekit security device, it does not ask for geolocation authorization.
And since the switch is supposed to be turned on you do not ask for authorization to connect the alarm.
These dummy switche devices are widely used in Homekit.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions