Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Thank you for your question and for making me aware of DLTdv. Poking around on the website of the Hedrick lab it seems as though the calibration is done with a wand: https://biomech.web.unc.edu/wand-calibration-tools/ I'm guessing that this is particularly useful in outdoor/large spaces where the capture volume is not continuous with the floor? Or in small scale settings where creating a tiny charuco would be challenging. I'd be curious to learn more about your use-case if you feel comfortable sharing it. In Caliscope, each camera has 15 parameters:
So I'm not sure that the rotation/translation values are known in those 9 parameters you are getting form DLTdv, but I could be wrong. Those are absolutely necessary for the triangulation. Just to explain the core benefit of the charuco: it resolves ambiguities about relative rotation (a checkerboard could be rotated 180 degrees and you'd never know). I have no doubt there are strategies to resolve this ambiguity, but it's not quite clear to me how to go about that in a good way. If you have any ideas, I'm all ears. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Caliscope is a very intriguing instrument. However, using ChArUco board for calibration is wildly inconvenient in our setup. Traditionally, we used DLTdv to calculate calibration coefficients for our cameras. Given that DLTdv produces 9 parameters, it follows that some or all of them might be the same that Caliscope calculates during the calibration step.
My question is - can I somehow import DLTdv calibration into Caliscope and, omitting the internal calibration step, use those during 3D pose estimation?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions